Ugly Person Laughing

Ugly Person Laughing. Most Ugly Person Ever. fat
  • Most Ugly Person Ever. fat



  • mac1984user
    Apr 27, 08:40 AM
    if any of you are concerned about being tracked - why on earth would you buy any product that has a GPS in it (all computers cash info) and why on earth would you buy a cell phone - the towers know almost exactly when (which apple doesn't know) and where you are? The reaction to this news is stupid.

    I pretty much agree with you, but I can see where others are coming from on this one. Mobile phones and computers are, in this age, a necessity. There's very little point in denying that. Still, people want to maintain their privacy. I think some people thought it was possible to maintain privacy while owning necessary items. You can't expect someone not to buy a computer or phone. That's not a solution. I respect the idea that people enjoy anonymity and I do too. It's nearly impossible in this world, but what little can be done is worth pursuing in my opinion, so people's expectations, while perhaps a bit naive are not absurd.





    Ugly Person Laughing. Who Needs
  • Who Needs



  • VanMac
    Aug 11, 10:26 AM
    I say it everytime they talk about this..... I'll buy one.....just go ahead and release it already





    Ugly Person Laughing. Thanks to all the people who
  • Thanks to all the people who



  • SuperCachetes
    Mar 5, 07:30 PM
    The same model applies to the 'church'.

    They are on the wane, and need new conscripts.

    Gays are less likely to give them that.

    That's (sadly) believable. See, now you're talking. I knew you didn't always pop round just to throw a cheeky non sequitur into the works. ;)





    Ugly Person Laughing. Couples pictures view ugly has
  • Couples pictures view ugly has



  • RedTomato
    Aug 12, 03:58 AM
    Ah but Finland is a tiny social democrat country that's home to some of the world's largest mobile companies. They like to give a bit back to their home communities.

    For example, deaf people in Finland get free / very cheap video-capable mobile phones and very cheap video calling rates so that they can sign to each other on the phone. (or access sign/ spoken language translation services - very important for work)

    The rest of us deaf people around the world are screaming for the same thing, but do we get it bollocks? Videophoning on a mobile remains majorly expensive for anything more than a few minutes per month.





    Ugly Person Laughing. what Ugly+person+smiling
  • what Ugly+person+smiling



  • gnasher729
    Apr 8, 07:43 AM
    Isn't this hypocritical since Apple has been known to do this in their retail stores too?

    Sources? Evidence? Easy to make cheap accusations, much harder to prove them.





    Ugly Person Laughing. Free crazy face of the ugly
  • Free crazy face of the ugly



  • fivepoint
    Apr 27, 04:19 PM
    It'd be fascinating to see how much people cared about 'layers' if the documents in question related to Bush's National Guard deployment or something similar. ;) Haha, no bias here boys!

    The difference between me and you is that I'd want an explanation in either account. ;)





    Ugly Person Laughing. Belongs to top searches Site, please cast your vote for freeugly person Gallery of funny jan http homecompetition give Host and ugly submitsep attractive
  • Belongs to top searches Site, please cast your vote for freeugly person Gallery of funny jan http homecompetition give Host and ugly submitsep attractive



  • samcraig
    Apr 27, 09:32 AM
    How is the talk of slower performance because the database isn't as large any different than the discussion about the data in the first place.

    Several people were criticizing people for having tin foil hats when it came to what the data was being used for, etc

    And now the same people are wearing the same tin foil hats/complaining about some mythological "slow down" by having a smaller database.

    Hypocrisy LOL





    Ugly Person Laughing. is an ugly person find the
  • is an ugly person find the



  • nunes013
    Mar 25, 11:41 PM
    If they start pumping out release candidates now, I think late July is is too far away. WWDC early June is more likely.

    Major OS releases have historically been $129. I don't think that'll happen this time--$99 or $79 makes more sense (Apple likes people to upgrade, and their software prices aren't as high as they used to be). But that's just me speculating.




    i was thinking and kind of hoping for that. wwdc release and them saying that it is a great price. apple has definitely been done a lot with pricing lately with the ipad starting at $500, snow leopard and ilife prices pretty cheap and maybe mobileme coming down in price. apple is getting better with pricing imo. they are more reasonable for many things lately.





    Ugly Person Laughing. Ugly+person+smiling
  • Ugly+person+smiling



  • arkitect
    Mar 22, 12:55 PM
    Competition is good.
    I agree.

    But who in their right minds would want to own something called a Playbook? :o





    Ugly Person Laughing. myself and an ugly person.
  • myself and an ugly person.



  • mccldwll
    Apr 27, 08:38 AM
    Apple's solution is fine by me. They wouldn't have done anything if there wasn't so much press about it, but I guess that's a good reason (one of the only ones) for the press to exist. Still, they all managed to get it a bit wrong, though. I noticed (like so many others out there), that the map wasn't recording my EXACT location, but just cell towers and wifi spots I may have accessed. The info didn't really bother me. It wasn't like it had me pegged at my local pub - or did it?!?! =)


    I looked at the map from a recent road trip. It showed cell towers 50 miles off the route I was on--probably next towers over in case I headed that direction. It's the apple bashing trolls who are blowing this way out of proportion.





    Ugly Person Laughing. ugly couple engaged
  • ugly couple engaged



  • phalseHUD
    Apr 10, 01:58 PM
    Interesting news, but the bit about booting competitors is downright disgusting.

    Couldn't agree more, disgraceful to be honest. This part of Apple I cannot abide.





    Ugly Person Laughing. Most Ugly Person Ever. ugly
  • Most Ugly Person Ever. ugly



  • Bilbo63
    Apr 19, 02:43 PM
    I'm not saying that Apple stole IP from Xerox, but what I am is that its quite disappointing to see Apple fanboys trying to distort the past into making it seem as though Apple created the first GUI, when that is CLEARLY not the case. The GUI had its roots in Xerox PARC. That, is a FACT.

    Many of "Apple fanboys" understand that the key GUI concepts were done at Xerox and give Xerox full credit for some incredible work. It is really too bad that they (Xerox brass) didn't understand what it was that their engineers were developing.

    Fortunately for Apple they "got it" and gave those same engineers the means to run with the GUI concept. Since that time, Apple has done a tremendous work expanding on those basic ideas and much of that work has been repeatedly copied.

    I give Xerox full credit, their early work was nothing short of a game-changer for the entire industry.

    edit... spelling. Ugh!





    Ugly Person Laughing. a weird people Laughing at
  • a weird people Laughing at



  • Silentwave
    Aug 6, 10:18 AM
    If you look at the banner pictures from WWDC 2006 you can see that the PowerMac / Mac Pro still lookes the same ...

    Does this mean that the Mac Pro will look like the PowerMac or that there wont be any release of Mac Pro at the WWDC 2006 ... ?

    No, that just means that if you'd been looking at hthe other threads, you'd know that there is *nothing* new on the banner- they won't be spoiling any of the stevenote's surprises! Apple isn't dumb.





    Ugly Person Laughing. stock photo : Crazy wacky ugly
  • stock photo : Crazy wacky ugly



  • TripHop
    Jun 10, 05:55 PM
    Gazelle (http://www.gazelle.com/) buys old iPhones too. :)





    Ugly Person Laughing. She#39;s also laughing.
  • She#39;s also laughing.



  • raymondso
    Sep 19, 10:14 AM
    Could be that they are expecting a flood of returns after they introduce the new MB and MBP. And they are waiting so they can send out fresh referbs. Just a though.
    reasonable:p
    and i hope u are right! :D





    Ugly Person Laughing. lots of ugly people that
  • lots of ugly people that



  • Val-kyrie
    Jul 30, 01:27 PM
    Gee, talk about getting ahead of yourself.

    Core 3 will be out before Vista is. I'm going to call it now.

    Everybody, be my witness, Core 3 (any processor that goes beyond Core 2 because I don't know if they'll call it "Core 3") will be out before a consumer version of Vista is shipped.

    You don't think Vista will be out before the revision to the Core 2 Duo due in Q1 2007 with the Santa Rosa chipset??? I bet Vista will ship by the time the Santa Rosa chipset is ready, especially because MS is suggesting Vista systems use harddrives or Mobos with flash RAM to speed up the boot process.





    Ugly Person Laughing. no ugly nov Ugly+person+
  • no ugly nov Ugly+person+



  • Teddy's
    Nov 28, 07:35 PM
    Universal could make their OWN player... one that only plays Universal music, downloads from Universal.com or some ***** like that, rips cds from universal only, and charge$$ for EVERY TIME an individual plays the song"
    OH, I think that would be the dream of those CEO's.
    Yeah, a dream made in HELL!!! (by lawyers)
    I'm really :mad:

    Edit: I thought that universal would be that label that has less control over musicians creativity... I know some indie bands who have stated that once in while...





    Ugly Person Laughing. chant003/these-ugly-people
  • chant003/these-ugly-people



  • dscuber9000
    Mar 1, 08:13 AM
    Yet another case of straight people telling gay people how being gay works. I just don't get it.:rolleyes:





    Ugly Person Laughing. old, ugly man thing out of my
  • old, ugly man thing out of my



  • AidenShaw
    Aug 27, 08:17 AM
    I believe Intel has been having trouble getting the required chipsets out on time to the desktop market.

    You can get the chips themselves without much trouble- the retail versions are available at Newegg for the 1.86, 2.13, 2.66, and 2.93 Extreme Core 2 Duo chips, with the sole out of stock chip being the 2.4GHz chip, with an estimated time of arrival being Sept. 1st at 2:30PM.
    I was at a local DIY store Saturday, and they had stacks of Core 2 Duo (Conroe) chips in all speeds, and lots of mobos with 965 and 975 chipsets.

    It would be unusual for that store to have all that kit if there's a supply problem.

    http://www.centralcomputer.com/products.asp?pline=HCPUI





    GermanSuplex
    Jun 23, 03:38 PM
    Same story here: I got the call today that despite being the first and only one on the reservation list at my store, they will not have any iPhones tomorrow.

    I'm not surprised, but yeah... Radio Shack shouldn't have even bothered announcing anything.





    Val-kyrie
    Jul 30, 01:22 PM
    So are we really going to get ALL of these new toys come WWDC? Leopard preview, Merom laptops, Core2/Woodcrest Mac Pros, Core2 Imacs (oh, and maybe a movie download add to iTunes) That sounds like an awful lot of stuff to cover in such a short period of time. What do people think about timelines for introduction here?

    Doubtful. This would leave nothing for September. (I hope this hasn't already been said, but I want to post before reading the other 200+ via modem). My prediction is the debut of Mac Pros, a preview of Leopard and perhaps an iMac update. The Merom chips will not be shipped until the end of Aug., so expect the unveiling of the MBPs in a (slightly) new form factor with 64 bit Core 2 Duo in Sep., along with the silent update of MBs, and an iMac update if they are not updated in Aug. I have not a clue about movie updates or updates to the iPod lines, though by Sep. would be reasonable.





    SevenInchScrew
    Dec 14, 12:25 AM
    Click for HUGE-size

    http://imgur.com/q3woJ.jpg

    http://imgur.com/9hFqL.jpg

    http://imgur.com/4RFKo.jpg

    http://imgur.com/mBrb3.jpg

    http://imgur.com/duAaM.jpg

    http://imgur.com/8yROf.jpg

    http://imgur.com/pWuXW.jpg





    Lord Blackadder
    Mar 22, 03:16 PM
    How can any government meet armed internal rebellion without qualifying as "slaughtering their own people"?

    The UN resolution has determined that the Libyan government's response to the opposition uprising has been "aggressive", and furthermore that Libyans need to be protected from their own government's military and security forces. The implicit judgement is that Gaddafi no longer has a mandate to rule, and that by fighting to maintain power he his fighting an aggressive war against a legitimate political movement.

    How would you characterize the situation? I don't want to jump to intervention when other options are available, but so far the NFZ has reduced Gaddafi's capacity to bombard population centers - though he is still doing just that.





    azzurri000
    Sep 18, 11:32 PM
    All I have to say is:
    "what the hell is taking them so frigging long?"

    This update better be bitchin!



    Reacent Post

    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Total Pageviews

    My Ping in TotalPing.com